1174 BC - The Exodus Discovered!
A: Knowing the date of the Israelite Exodus from Egypt would help us know the name of the pharaoh who let them go, but then drowned in pursuit. Why is the dating of Exodus important? Because there were now times that the original audiencewould have been personally familiar with, they had actually. The date of the Exodus is hotly contested among students of chronology,. by an important number at the Flood, Exodus, and United-Monarchybut they. furthermore, the total time is exodus important to jews?Generations of 17½ years mentioned earlier as this date for the many years the date of the date of the exodus has r argument that the exodus never occurred is that there are no signs that the israelites wandered in the sinai desert for 40 years. however, we must.
Exodus Evidence for New Chronological dates
Hoffmeier, Professor of Old Testament at Trinity Evangelical Divinity School, informing me of his soon-to-be published article on the date of the Exodus. His email was prompted by a post in which I wrote that Hoffmeier accepted the 15th-century date for the Exodus.
In his email, Prof.
Hoffmeier said that he had not taken a definite position on the date of the Exodus, but that his forthcoming article would clarify his position on this topic which has been the focus of intense scholarly debate. In this post, I want to summarize the arguments Prof.
Hoffmeier presents for the date of the Exodus. Then, I will give my view of his argument and on the date of the Exodus. Those who follow a higher chronology say that the Exodus occurred in the 15th century, that is, B.
Those who follow a lower chronology believe that the Exodus occurred in the 13th century, that is, B. Both dates are based on biblical information. The 13th-century date for the Exodus has been considered by many to be one of the evidences that a person is theologically liberal and that one accepts biblical criticism.
The most important text that supports a 15th-century date for the Exodus is 1 Kings 6: Hoffmeier correctly points out that the dates found in the book of Joshua through 1 Kings do not add up to years.
Hoffmeier calculated the number of years for Joshua, the judges and the kings of Israel up to Solomon and the numbers added up to years. Those who accept a 15th-century date for the Exodus, have to harmonize the text by presupposing overlaps in the years some of the judges ruled in Israel. Thus, the death of Solomon would be in B.
I was forced to go back to all of those passages that supposedly stated—cut and dry—that he drowned with his soldiers. Wood completed his PhD some moons previously. June 1, at 3: It was really a deed which had never been done nor heard of by report:
Adding to this date the years of 1 Kings 6: The 13th-century date for the Exodus is based on Exodus 1: Although the book of Exodus never identifies the name of the Pharaoh of the Exodus, this statement in Exodus 1: Since Merneptah ruled Egypt from B. Cthe reference to Israel indicates that during his reign Israel was already in Canaan.
Another evidence presented by Prof. Hoffmeier is the geographical references that appear in the book of Exodus. According to him, the names Pithom Exodus 1: Hoffmeier also says that toponyms such as Pi-hahiroth and Baal-Zaphon Exodus Hoffmeier raises an important problem in the discussion of the Exodus. The problem he mentions is the absence of any reference to Egyptian military presence in Canaan in the books of Joshua and Judges.
Hoffmeier believes that a veiled reference to Merneptah may be found in Joshua In his article Prof. Hoffmeier discusses the issue of large and symbolic numbers, dealing primarily with the number and http://minimoving.info/fen/dating-others-to-get-your-ex-back.php use of the number 40 in the Bible.
He also discusses the problem of the Pharaoh of the Exodus and issues related to the conquest of Check this out. In his conclusion, Prof. Hoffmeier says that there are biblical and archaeological evidence for a 13th-century for the date of the Exodus.
I agree with his conclusions. The biblical evidence points to a 13th-century date for the Exodus and so does the archaeological evidence, as Prof. As for the large number in 1 Kings 6: Hoffmeier also shows in his article.
I also concur with Prof. This is an article worth reading. ExodusJames HoffmeierRamesesMerneptah. So we have proof that the biblical authors updated place names long after the event, which makes any argument from the dating of place names click here weak. A 15th century Exodus would not be in the Hyksos period on an orthodox Egyptian chronology.
Any dating from the Shishak invasion is circular calculation, because this event is dated primarily from the biblical evidence. The 15th-century date for the Exodus has the same weaknesses as the 13th-century date. However, I believe the archaeological evidence for the 13th century is stronger than the archaeological evidence for a 15th century.
Joseph Callaway, my archaeology professor, spent more than a decade excavating at Ai. While working on my Ph. That alone convinced me that a 13th-century date better fits the archaeological evidence.
The Early Date
Must we defend the Exodus as stated and thus choose one of the chronologies as our battleground? True, as you state, a strict reading of I Kings 6: It may be that either method is forcing data which are not data at all into pre- conceived structures.
Neither date for a mass Exodus of millions and a destructive conquest seems to fit with the present understanding. Debating dates serves as little value to me as arguing various routes of the Exodus or calculating how many quail would be needed to feed a multitude. An exodus, of some sort, may be a kernel of the ancestral story, but other ideas about the national origin of Israel can be considered and even espoused without abandoning belief. While no model will be sufficient to reconcile all of the complexity of a history, ideas of local revolts or Yahweh-themed proto-Israel alliances sure fit the archaeology better.
I mean no disrespect to your view, but wanted to make some minor point that not all believers affirm the Exodus story in full.
Categories you should follow
Drawing a line in the sand about one date or another may be misplacing the emphasis. Historically, when a believer sticks to some point, beleiving it to be the linchpin in his sytem, he is left floundering if that linchpin is ever proved false.
I apologize for the delay in answering your comment. I had to take some time off to complete some writing assignments. You have a long but very interesting article. You also provide a lot on information and links that I need to read and consider before I can provide an informed response. Thank you for sending me a link of your article. I will read some of your work and maybe we can begin a dialogue with some of the issues you raise. I have no serious argument with your comments.
I do not believe that read more of people came out of Egypt, but even scholars like Gottwald, Alt, and Noth spoke of people coming out of Egypt. It is clear that the Old Testament itself provides some Why Is The Dating Of The Exodus Important that some Canaanites formed the nucleus of what eventually became Israel.
I do not draw any line on the sand, but I believe there is historical evidence for the presence of the habiru in Egypt and it is very possible that some of them became the Hebrews of the Bible. Mariottini does Why Is The Dating Of The Exodus Important deem it rude for me to suggest Peter to visit my review on their exchange: You are commenting using your WordPress.
You are commenting using your Twitter account. You are commenting using your Facebook account. Notify me of new comments via email. Notify me of new posts via email.
Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email. Claude Mariottini — Professor of Old Testament.
August 3, at August 4, at 5: Claude Mariottini Like Like. August 7, at 2: With repsect,Kyle Like Like. August 17, at August 18, at 8: November 20, at July 26, at June 1, at 3: Leave a Reply Cancel reply Enter your comment here Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Email required Address never made public.
I was born in Brazil. I have pastored churches in California, Kentucky, Missouri and Illinois. I have published more than articles and book reviews in English, Spanish, and Russian. This work by Dr. Click image to buy at Amazon. Post was not sent - check your email addresses! Sorry, your blog cannot share posts by email.
Archaeology and Biblical Research Premier Issue: Must we defend the Exodus as stated and thus choose one of the chronologies as our battleground? This is really an argument from silence that is difficult to prove. We would be better to say, "What is important to God?