minimoving.info.

The Linguistic Traces Of Deception In Online Hookup Profiles. Looking For Hookups!

Deception Profiles The Online Linguistic Hookup In Traces Of

Site Navigation

1 Apr Despite common stereotypes about those who use different types of online dating , psychological research on online dating agency users' characteristics is actually very limited, and no scientific study has yet examined the individual characteristics of Tinder™ users. The current exploratory study aimed to. 2 Feb This article investigates whether deceptions in online dating profiles correlate with changes in the way daters write about themselves in the free-text portion of the profile, and whether these changes are detectable by both computerized linguistic analyses and human judges. Computerized analyses (Study. What Lies Beneath: The Linguistic Traces of Deception in Online Dating Profiles. Catalina L. Toma1 & Jeffrey T. Hancock2. 1 Department of Communication Arts, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI , USA. 2 Department of Communication, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY , USA. This article investigates.

Self-esteem As with sociability, the stereotype of internet dating sites being used by people who have low self-esteem is not broadly supported by the literature. Putting your best face forward: A total score was http://minimoving.info/hyme/is-he-trying-to-make-me-jealous-quiz.php, with higher scores indicating higher self-esteem Rosenberg, Rosenberg, M. How do we deceive Journal Cogent Psychology Volume 3, - Issue 1.

By continuing to browse this site you agree to us using cookies as described in About Cookies. Wiley Online Library is migrating to a new platform powered by Atypon, the leading provider of scholarly publishing platforms.

The Linguistic Traces Of Deception In Online Hookup Profiles

For more information, please visit our migration page: Previous article in issue: Next article in issue: This article investigates whether deceptions in online dating profiles correlate with changes in the way daters write about themselves in the free-text portion of the profile, and whether these changes are detectable by both computerized linguistic analyses and human judges. Computerized analyses Study 1 found that deceptions manifested themselves through linguistic cues pertaining to a liars' emotions and cognitions and b liars' strategic efforts to manage their self-presentations.

Human judges Study 2 relied on different and nonpredictive linguistic cues to assess daters' trustworthiness. The findings inform theories concerned with deception, media, and self-presentation, and also expound on how writing style influences perceived trustworthiness.

Sexual permissiveness All participants were included in this analysis. An International Journal on Personal Relationships387 — Some research actually indicates the opposite: This article investigates whether deceptions in online dating profiles correlate with changes in the way daters write about themselves in the free-text portion of the profile, and whether these changes are detectable by both computerized linguistic analyses and human judges. Women want men who are — wait for it — tall and wealthy, according to online dating research by Gunter J.

Le mensonge en filigrane: Les affordances technologiques p. Die technologische Ausgestaltung z.

Site Search Navigation

View all 48 citations. By continuing to browse this site you agree to us using cookies as described in About Cookies Notice: Go to old article view. English Chinese French German.

Abstract This article investigates whether deceptions in online dating profiles correlate with changes in the way daters write about themselves in the free-text portion of the profile, and whether these changes are detectable by both computerized linguistic analyses and human judges.

Abstract Le mensonge en filigrane: Continue reading full article.

The Linguistic Traces Of Deception In Online Hookup Profiles

Publication History Issue online: Articles related to the one you are viewing Please enable Javascript to view the related content of this article. Number of times cited: MalinTerry GudaitisThomas J.

Love, Lies and What They Learned

HancockCheryl BoothEthical dilemma: CoxAnthony D. CoxTo Err is human? TomaDhavan V. Close article support pane.